🔗 Share this article

Tomas Anez Dos Santos worked in a tiny clearing far in the Peruvian jungle when he noticed sounds drawing near through the lush forest.

He realized that he had been hemmed in, and froze.

“A single individual positioned, pointing using an arrow,” he recalls. “And somehow he became aware of my presence and I started to flee.”

He had come encountering members of the Mashco Piro. Over many years, Tomas—residing in the modest village of Nueva Oceania—was almost a neighbour to these nomadic tribe, who shun interaction with strangers.

A new study issued by a advocacy organisation indicates there are a minimum of 196 described as “remote communities” remaining worldwide. This tribe is thought to be the largest. The study says half of these groups could be decimated within ten years unless authorities fail to take additional to protect them.

The report asserts the biggest dangers come from timber harvesting, extraction or operations for oil. Uncontacted groups are extremely susceptible to common sickness—therefore, the report notes a risk is presented by contact with proselytizers and social media influencers in pursuit of attention.

In recent times, Mashco Piro people have been venturing to Nueva Oceania more and more, based on accounts from inhabitants.

The village is a angling community of a handful of families, perched atop on the shores of the Tauhamanu River in the heart of the Peruvian jungle, a ten-hour journey from the closest village by boat.

The territory is not designated as a safeguarded area for isolated tribes, and timber firms function here.

Tomas says that, on occasion, the noise of industrial tools can be heard around the clock, and the community are seeing their forest disrupted and ruined.

In Nueva Oceania, inhabitants say they are torn. They dread the tribal weapons but they also possess deep admiration for their “brothers” who live in the jungle and desire to protect them.

“Let them live according to their traditions, we can't change their way of life. That's why we keep our separation,” states Tomas.

Residents in Nueva Oceania are concerned about the destruction to the community's way of life, the risk of conflict and the chance that loggers might subject the community to sicknesses they have no resistance to.

While we were in the settlement, the tribe appeared again. A young mother, a young mother with a toddler girl, was in the jungle gathering fruit when she heard them.

“There were cries, sounds from individuals, numerous of them. Like it was a crowd yelling,” she shared with us.

This marked the first instance she had come across the Mashco Piro and she ran. After sixty minutes, her thoughts was persistently throbbing from fear.

“Since there are loggers and companies destroying the forest they are escaping, perhaps out of fear and they come in proximity to us,” she stated. “It is unclear what their response may be with us. That is the thing that scares me.”

Recently, two individuals were confronted by the tribe while angling. One man was struck by an arrow to the gut. He survived, but the second individual was located deceased subsequently with several puncture marks in his physique.

The Peruvian government follows a approach of no engagement with remote tribes, establishing it as prohibited to start contact with them.

The strategy originated in a nearby nation after decades of campaigning by community representatives, who noted that initial exposure with remote tribes could lead to entire communities being eliminated by sickness, destitution and starvation.

During the 1980s, when the Nahau people in the country first encountered with the world outside, a significant portion of their population died within a short period. During the 1990s, the Muruhanua community experienced the similar destiny.

“Secluded communities are very susceptible—epidemiologically, any interaction could introduce sicknesses, and even the basic infections could eliminate them,” says an advocate from a tribal support group. “From a societal perspective, any contact or interference can be extremely detrimental to their existence and well-being as a society.”

For the neighbours of {